Author: toker

Wisconsin Democratic Lawmakers Announce New Marijuana Legalization Bill To Promote ‘People’s Freedom’

Wisconsin Democratic lawmakers are unveiling a new bill to legalize marijuana in the state—though its prospects of passage remain dubious with Republicans still in control of both chambers of the legislature.

“Legalization of cannabis is not radical. What’s radical is continuing a system that destroys lives, drains resources and ignores the will of the people,” Rep. Darrin Madison (D) said during a press conference on Monday. “Wisconsin’s ready.”

While a majority of states, including most of those neighboring Wisconsin, have legalized marijuana, “Wisconsin hasn’t, which leaves us behind the curve,” he said. “Not because the evidence isn’t clear, not because people don’t support it, but because politics keeps on blocking progress.”

“The will of the people is clear on this issue, and today we’re acting on it,” he said. “Legalizing cannabis in Wisconsin is an economic necessity, a public safety strategy and a racial justice imperative.”

Madison also made the case that, because President Donald Trump signed into law large-scale legislation that included provisions to ban most consumable hemp products, legalization at the state level could give the industry a “lifeline, allowing them to transition from hemp-derived THC to cannabis-derived THC and keep jobs, investments and innovation right here in our home state.”

“Legalizing cannabis is about replacing a failed punishment model with smart, evidence-based regulation,” he said. “People already use cannabis. Regulation ensures products are tested, labeled and safe, especially at a time when unregulated substances and opioids continue to claim lives across Wisconsin.”

Rep. Andrew Hysell (D) also spoke at Monday’s event.

“If I’m going to boil down what marijuana legalization is really about, it’s super simple: Legalization is about freedom—the freedom of adults to make up their own mind and to make their own choice whether to consume cannabis,”he said. “In the United States, Wisconsin is an outlier in terms of denying people this freedom. We are only one of a few states that completely bans the marijuana plant.”

“Standing in the way of the people’s freedom is not good politics. Almost 70 percent of Wisconsinites want full adult use legalization, and even more want medical,” Hysell said, adding that Wisconsin residents “deserve the freedom to make their own choices about cannabis, so let’s give them that right. It’s time.”

Here are some of the main details of the forthcoming bill, according to a legislative analysis shared with Marijuana Moment: 

• Adults 21 and older could purchase and possess marijuana and hemp THC products.
• Hemp would be defined as a cannabis product containing up to 10 milligrams of an intoxicating cannabinoid such as delta-9 THC per 12 fluid ounces or per serving or per package of an edible.
• Any cannabis product with higher concentrations of intoxicating cannabinoids would be considered marijuana.
• The possession limit for marijuana would be up to 2.5 ounces of flower in a public space, up to five pounds of cannabis flower in a private residence, up to one gram of THC in a cannabis-infused product and up to 15 grams of a cannabis concentrate.
• A “Division of Cannabis Regulation” would be established within the state Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection. The division would be responsible of overseeing the “production, processing, transportation and testing of cannabis.”
• In order to sell marijuana in a dispensary, a business would need to receive a license from the state Department of Revenue (DOR).
• People 18 and older (or younger with consent from a parent or caregiver) could register as a medical marijuana patient if they have a qualifying condition, which includes cancer, glaucoma, AIDS/HIV, Crohn’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), opioid use disorder or “any other medical condition or treatment DHS designates by rule as a debilitating medical condition or treatment.”
• Marijuana would be subject to 10 percent excise tax for producers, a 10 percent excise tax for processors, a 5 percent tax for retailers for adult-use sales, a 10 percent occupational tax for cannabis microbusinesses, an optional 5 percent excise tax on retailers by localities and a 3 percent excise tax on marijuana for the buyer (unless that individual is a registered medical cannabis patient).
• Revenue from the 3 percent excise tax for consumers would go to DOH to support research into the health effects of cannabis use.
• Under the bill, there would be a “process to review convictions for acts that have been decriminalized under the bill. If the person is currently serving a sentence or on probation for such a conviction, the person may petition a court to vacate the conviction and expunge the record or, if applicable, adjust the conviction to a lower crime.”
• The legislation also contains provisions providing employment protections for people who use marijuana in compliance with the law while off the clock.

Meanwhile, a top Republican Wisconsin lawmaker recent said that President Donald Trump made the “wrong” choice to order the rescheduling of marijuana—which he called a “dangerous drug.”

However, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R) said the upside is that research barriers may be lifted in a way that demonstrates medical cannabis can be effectively used in a limited way as an alternative to prescription medications.

With just under a year before voters elect their next governor, the majority of the current candidates have made clear that they will support efforts to legalize marijuana—in part to fund public programs such as increased access to broadband.

And while there’s been splintering on the issue between the two chambers of the legislature, a Senate panel recently took up a Republican-led bill that would legalize medical marijuana in the state.

Senate President Mary Felzkowski (R) and Sen. Patrick Testin (R) filed the legislation, and the Senate Health Committee debated the proposal at a hearing in October, taking testimony from patients and other advocates. Members didn’t vote on the bill, but the chair said the panel would be advancing it “fairly quickly.”

Vos, for his part, said that month that he hopes lawmakers in the state can “find a consensus” on legislation to legalize medical marijuana. But he added that the cannabis bill filed by his Republican leadership counterpart in the Senate is “unlikely” to pass his chamber because it is “way too broad and way too wide-ranging.”

As the 2025 session was set to get underway, Felzkowski said she was “hoping to have a conversation” in the legislature about legalizing medical marijuana—though the Republican Assembly speaker still represented “an obstacle,” she added.

The Senate leader has previously sponsored medical cannabis legislation in past sessions, formally introduced the new legislation.

Meanwhile, a Republican candidate for governor of Wisconsin who has since left the race said in July that he was “open to considering different opportunities” when it comes to legalizing medical or adult-use marijuana in the state, though he has provided little in the way of specifics so far.

Current Gov. Tony Evers (D), who supports legalizing cannabis, isn’t seeking re-election—but he said in June that if his party can take control of the legislature, the state can “finally” legalize marijuana so that residents don’t have to go to neighboring Illinois to visit its adult-use market.

Separately in June, a poll from Marquette Law School found that two in three Wisconsin voters support legalizing marijuana.

The survey found that support for cannabis reform has generally increased over time since the institution first started tracking public opinion on legalization in 2013, with 67 percent of voters now backing the policy change. That’s 17 percentage points higher than the 2013 results.

Democrats are the most likely to favor legalizing cannabis, at 88 percent, followed by independents (79 percent). However, a majority of Republicans (56 percent) said they’re still opposed to adult-use legalization.

Underscoring the importance of party control, the state’s Republican-controlled Senate and Assembly this summer rejected another attempt to legalize marijuana, defeating amendments to budget legislation that would have ended prohibition in the state and established new medical and recreational cannabis programs.

Evers has routinely attempted to change that policy as part of his budget requests—and Democratic leaders have similarly pushed for reform.

Republicans in the legislature also cut the marijuana provisions from a state budget proposal in May, as they’ve done in past sessions.

Despite Republicans’ move to cut legalization from the budget legislation, party leaders recently acknowledged that the debate over medical marijuana legalization is “not going to go away,” and there’s hope it can be resolved this session.

—
Marijuana Moment is tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.
—

“I don’t think anyone is naive enough to think that marijuana and THC products aren’t present in the state of Wisconsin when they are readily available over state lines, so I think we need to come to an answer on this,” Assembly Majority Leader Rep. Tyler August (R) said in February. “I’m hopeful that we can.”

“If we’re going to call it medical marijuana, it needs to be treated like a pharmaceutical. But the marijuana debate is going to be something that is not going to go away,” Sen. Dan Feyen (R), the assistant majority leader, said at the time. “The margins are tighter.”

There have been repeated attempts to legalize medical marijuana in the legislature over recent years, including the introduction of legislation from the Assembly speaker that called for a limited program facilitated through state-run dispensaries. That proved controversial among his Republican colleagues, however, and it ultimately stalled out.

Evers previewed his plan to include marijuana legalization in his budget last January, while also arguing that residents of the state should be allowed to propose new laws by putting binding questions on the ballot—citing the fact that issues such as cannabis reform enjoy sizable bipartisan support while the GOP-controlled legislature has repeatedly refused to act.

Previously, in 2022, the governor signed an executive order to convene a special legislative session with the specific goal of giving people the right to put citizen initiatives on the ballot, raising hopes among advocates that cannabis legalization could eventually be decided by voters. The GOP legislature did not adopt the proposal, however.

Evers said in late 2024 that marijuana reform is one of several key priorities the state should pursue in the 2025 session, as lawmakers work with a budget surplus.

Days after he made the remarks, a survey found the reform would be welcomed by voters in rural parts of the state. Nearly two thirds (65 percent) said they support legalizing cannabis.

Last May, the governor said he was “hopeful” that the November 2024 election would lead to Democratic control of the legislature, in part because he argued it would position the state to finally legalize cannabis.

“We’ve been working hard over the last five years, several budgets, to make that happen,” he said at the time. “I know we’re surrounded by states with recreational marijuana, and we’re going to continue to do it.”

A Wisconsin Democratic Assemblymember tried to force a vote on a medical cannabis compromise proposal in 2024, as an amendment to an unrelated kratom bill, but he told Marijuana Moment he suspects leadership intentionally pulled that legislation from the agenda at the last minute to avoid a showdown on the issue.

Meanwhile, the state Department of Revenue released a fiscal estimate of the economic impact of a legalization bill from then-Sen. Melissa Agard (D) in 2023, projecting that the reform would generate nearly $170 million annually in tax revenue.

A legislative analysis requested by lawmakers estimated that Wisconsin residents spent more than $121 million on cannabis in Illinois alone in 2022, contributing $36 million in tax revenue to the neighboring state.

Evers and other Democrats have since at least 2024 insisted that they would be willing to enact a modest medical marijuana program, even if they’d prefer more comprehensive reform.

Read the full text of the new marijuana bill below:

The post Wisconsin Democratic Lawmakers Announce New Marijuana Legalization Bill To Promote ‘People’s Freedom’ appeared first on Marijuana Moment.

Source link

California Is Spending Millions to Decide What Counts as ‘Real’ Cannabis Flavor

When California legalized adult-use cannabis, it did something bold and imperfect. It moved faster than science.

That was not recklessness. It was necessity. For decades, federal law treated cannabis as a Schedule I substance, effectively blocking large-scale, real-world research into its health, economic, environmental, and social effects. States that chose legalization were forced to build the plane while flying it.

Now, California is doing something rare in American drug policy. It is paying to understand the consequences of legalization, honestly and at scale.

Quietly, the California Department of Cannabis Control has awarded nearly $80 million since 2020 to fund academic research on cannabis. In late 2025 alone, the agency approved close to $30 million for 22 new projects across the University of California system and California State University campuses. The work spans public health, labor safety, environmental protection, taxation, consumer behavior, and criminal justice.

This is not prohibition by another name. It is legalization growing up.

Why the State Is Funding Cannabis Research at All

The DCC says it plainly on its website. Cannabis remains a Schedule I drug under federal law. That designation comes with strict limits on who can study it, how it can be studied, and what products can be used. As a result, the United States knows far less about cannabis than it does about alcohol, tobacco, or prescription drugs that cause far more documented harm.

California decided not to wait.

Some of the revenue collected from legal cannabis taxes is now being routed back into research to study the effects of adult-use legalization in the real world. Not lab rats. Not outdated government weed. Actual products, actual consumers, actual communities.

The goal is not to relitigate legalization. It is to make it work better.

What California Is Studying, Broadly

Look past the grant titles and a clear picture emerges.

Researchers are examining how cannabis vape packaging and warning labels affect young adults’ perceptions and purchasing behavior. Others are studying THC-infused beverages to understand onset time, absorption, and impairment under real consumption conditions. Several projects focus on older adults, a fast-growing segment of cannabis consumers often ignored in public debate.

There is also serious attention being paid to labor and environment. Studies are underway on pesticide exposure among cannabis workers, crop yields across cultivation styles, water use, wildlife impacts, and the environmental benefits of licensure versus unregulated grows.

On the policy side, California is funding research into taxation, pricing, illicit markets, tribal cannabis partnerships, equity outcomes, and how local zoning decisions affect housing and displacement.

This is not a moral investigation. It is a systems audit.

Legalization Under the Microscope

One of the more honest aspects of this research push is that it does not assume legalization solved everything.

Multiple projects explicitly ask why unregulated cannabis markets persist years after legalization. Others look at how taxes and prices influence consumer behavior across more than 20 states. Some examine whether equity programs are delivering meaningful participation or simply good intentions.

That level of self-scrutiny is unusual in drug policy. It is also necessary.

Legal cannabis is no longer an experiment. It is a regulated industry employing hundreds of thousands of people and serving millions of consumers. The question is no longer whether cannabis should be legal. It is whether the rules governing it actually reduce harm and expand access, or simply create new barriers.

This Is What Normalization Looks Like

There is a temptation to read any state-funded cannabis research as a prelude to crackdowns or restrictions. But the scope of California’s research suggests something else entirely.

Cannabis is being treated like alcohol, tobacco, and pharmaceuticals are treated. Studied continuously. Adjusted based on evidence. Regulated with the assumption that people will use it, not the fantasy that they will not.

That is what normalization looks like.

The irony is hard to miss. For decades, prohibition prevented meaningful cannabis research. Now legalization is funding the science prohibition blocked.

Why This Matters Beyond California

Because California is often the policy laboratory for the rest of the country.

Findings from these studies will shape labeling rules, worker protections, environmental standards, tax structures, and consumer education. Other states will borrow them. Federal agencies will cite them. Courts will reference them. The data will outlive the political moment that produced it.

Cannabis advocates often say they want policy guided by evidence rather than fear. This is what that looks like when it actually happens.

Not headlines. Not hype. Not panic.

Just a state admitting that legalization is not the end of the conversation. It is the beginning of a more honest one.

Cannabis did not wait for permission to exist. Now, California is doing the work to understand what that existence really means.

Photo: Shutterstock

<p>The post California Is Spending Millions to Decide What Counts as ‘Real’ Cannabis Flavor first appeared on High Times.</p>

Source link

Marijuana Doctors in New York Online for MMJ Card (2025 Updated)

Finding a doctor in New York for a medical marijuana consultation is incredibly simple with Online Medical Card. The entire process takes little time from start to finish. After registering with us, you will be …

Continue reading “Marijuana Doctors in New York Online for MMJ Card (2025 Updated)”

Source link

Nebraskans testify on medical marijuana bills, including making commissioners elected positions

Source link